Introduction
"Sonovabitch, was I ever in luck! 'Cause, man, if there's anything I like, it's drinkin' tit milk. And if there was anything that Josephine liked, it was flavin' me drink it outa her. The first afternoon she showed at the joint, she picked me out from the other dudes, 'cause I was the youngest lookin', then drove us in her car to a motel down near the beach. Before we went into the motel, she said to me: 'Billy, I don't know if you've ever been out with a woman quite like me. You see, I don't need a young man because I'm lonely or horny or anything like that. I have a husband and a little baby who give me all the company I need. What I need is ... is someone to ... relieve my breasts. My baby can't even begin to relieve me, and my husband—well, he's either too busy with his work or too tanked up on beer. Besides, I don't think my husband would like the idea.'
"By relievin' your breasts, ma'am, do you mean suckin' the extra milk out?' I asked. I was takin' in those mountains on her chest, already feastin' oh them in my mind and waterin' at the mouth.
"Yes, I'm afraid that's exactly what I mean.'
"I'll tell ya the truth, ma'am,' I said to her. 'Right now I can't think of anything I'd rather do than drink the milk outa those big beautiful tits of yours.'
"When she heard that, she gave me a little kiss right on my mouth, then led the way into the motel, as happy as a fuckin' schoolgirl on her first date. Watchin' those giant tits of hers balloonin' way out and bouncin' as she walked gave me a hard on like I'd never had before, man, and when we got inside, she noticed it pushin' my pants out the first thing.
"The idea of sucking my breasts is getting you hot, isn't it, Billy? Well, that's fine. After you have taken care of me, I'll take care of you. Now, dear, let's undress and get on the bed. It's better when we're naked, don't you think?'
"The next minute we were both bare-ass naked, man, and you shoulda seen the body on that bitch. Beautiful I Each one of her tits was as big as her head, I swear, and the nipples stuck out cherry red at least an inch. And what's more, man, there was milk oozing out of her nipples! It blew my fuckin' mind, seein' that. It got my balls to achin' and my cock to spewin' juice and my mouth to droolin'—so that both of us were creamin' all over, hotter than two dogs in heat.
"Josephine sucked off my big bubble of cock-cream, sort of moan in' with pleasure, then she sat on the edge of the bed, spreadin' her fat legs real wide. Her great, pudgy cunt caught my eye then and I watched for a second while the lips popped open, puttin' on display the biggest, deepest, juiciest gash I'd ever seen in my entire life. I had a sudden impulse, man, to dive right in, headfirst, and lap up all those delicious-lookin' juices pourin' out of her cunt hole; but those two huge tits of hers, bulgin' with milk and starin' out at me from their droolin' red eyes, were jus' too invitin'. First and foremost, I'm a tit milk freak, so, quick like a bunny rabbit, I wrap my two hands around one of those big melons and close my mouth on the nipple.
"I shit you not, man; it was like takin' the bag of a Jersey cow at milkin' time. That's how full ol' Josephine's tit was, and that's how long her nipple was. With the very first suck, her hot, sweet cream jus' shot out, like outa the floodgates of a dam. My stomach was empty from not drinkin' or eatin' anything all day, so I really gulped it down. Out of the corner of my eye, I could see the other tit droolin' cream out of the nipple, and that gave me a wild idea. Sonovabitch! I get hot jus' thinkin' about it! D'ya know what I did? Without takin' my mouth away or easin' up on my suckin', I took that other tit in my hands and squeezed.
"Man, you shoulda seen the milk squirtin' outa that other nipple. I mean, it really squirted! The milk splashed right down on my shoulder and ran in little streams down my naked body, givin' me the damndest thrill I'd ever had. And it must've excited the shit outa ol' Josephine, too, 'cause she grabbed my cock and started moanin' like crazy.
'Ooooooo, baby boy, you're making mama feel soooooo gooooood! Milk me, baby, milk me, milk me, milk me! Oh shit! Drink it all up! Drain my tits dry. Ooooooo, you sweet little fucker, you're driving me out of my mind!'
"That's what I wanted to do to the bitch: drive her outa her mind; get her so fuckin' hot that she'd not only give me all of her tit milk, but all of her cunt cream to drink, too. And that, man, is exactly what happened; a few minutes more of my suckin' one tit while squeezin' the milk outa the other, and she flopped back on the bed, spread her soft, fat legs real wide, and pushed my head down toward her big, juicy gash. By now, most of the milk was outa her tits, anyway, and it was high time for me to give her another kind of 'relief.'
"In a hot second, man, there I was with my face completely buried in Josey's own private Grand Canyon, lappin' up her own private Colorado River. And I ain't jivin' when I call her spewin' cunt juices a river—I actually had to gulp at. sixty per to keep from drownin'. I mean, she had her hands pressin' on the back of my head, holdin' me in there tight, refusin' to let me out till her cunt was drained like her tits. But the bitch wasn't gonna get off that easy. Shit no. Yours truly was gettin' badly in need of some relief, too.
"With my hands I pulled hers from the back of my head and swung my ass around over her head, hangin' my throbbin', drippin' cock and balls smack over her mouth. She got the message. In a flash, ol' Josey opened up her yap as wide as she could, grabbed me around my little brown ass-cheeks, pulled them down hard—and let my cock sink far down into her throat. Then, man, I started pumpin' my ass, fuckin' her mouth for all I was worth, at the same time jammin' my long tongue deep into her cunt hole.
"We kept that up for I don't know how long, maybe one minute, maybe an hour, suckin' each other off like it was the last we'd ever get, like we'd die if we didn't suck the guts right outa each-other. Then the whole fuckin' ceilin' and all the walls came crashin' in on us, crushin' us to a pulp. We moaned and groaned and squirmed in pure agony, man— but it was no use. She wouldn't let go of my cock and I wouldn't let go of her cunt hole. The bitch was literally tryin' to suck my balls up through my cock to get the last little drop of my come! And I was literally tryin' to suck her inside out, her jism was so delicious.
"Yeah, talk about soul food; that fat mama was the soul food of the gods. But you know, man, you can't jus' go on forever eatin' away on each other like that. You'd have a fuckin' heart attack if ya did. We finally had to stop. Josey had to go home and fix dinner for her old man and get her kid from the baby-sitter. But before she left, she told me somethin' that really got me worked up: she said if I was better educated and could support her with some kind of respectable job where I wouldn't be whorin' around with other women, she'd leave her old man and tie in with me. Honest, that's what she said! And I could tell that she meant it.
"I thought it over and the next time we got together we struck a bargain. I told her that I'd get more schoolin' and after that I'd get a good straight job if she'd somehow keep her tits fresh with milk. She agreed because she said my suckin' her milk really turned her on and that was the whole point in wanting to shack with me.
"So here I am, man, tryin' to get myself lined up for some more schoolin'. I could make some big bread in my job at the escort service, but I really dig the shit outa fat Josey. I'd do most anything to have her all to myself."
The foregoing excerpt from one of the case histories in this book serves to introduce the reader to the controversial subject matter we are dealing with—i.e. oral sex, or more specifically' oral masturbation. Also, it is deemed apropos, before proceeding with the various case histories presented in the main body of the text, to reflect objectively on the reason for the controversy and the commonly held opinions of professional researchers.
There are, of course, many varieties of oral sex, most of which fall in the category of mutuality, involving two or more persons. Discounting such "innocent" forms of oral contact as mouth-to-mouth kissing, the most common variety is generally regarded as soixaiite-veuf, frequently referred to as "sixty-nine," which brings male and female together in a dual mouth-to-genital, fellatio-cunnilingus posture. This is an act widely practiced throughout the world and far back in history; thus it has been well investigated and documented by numerous psychiatrists, psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists and other scientists, not to mention a great phalanx of very capable lay researchers.
This work proposes to explore not only the attitudes of past and present researchers on the subject of soixante-neuf said its variations, but also the actual physical acts involved and the circumstances, desires, and basic human instincts that inspire them. For, what conclusions can be reached from a controversy if the sort of thing that instigated it is not exposed for study? Certainly it would be most unfair to put oral sex, or anything else, on trial without some form of evidence upon which to base an opinion.
In order to study the practice as thoroughly as possible, the method of developing case histories through personal interviews has been utilized. This method which is used in the following chapters is considered superior because an individual sex act may be of minimal scientific value unless knowledge of the events occurring before and after is obtained. It is precisely this overall, multiple-perspective view which is achieved through the medium of the case history, presented in the words of the very ones who were involved directly in the act.
However, a factor to be considered in presenting five case histories for general study by the public is the obvious fact that professional diagnosis and prognosis is needed for a complete picture of the situations. To fill this void, therefore, each case history narrative in this book has been spliced with an appropriate commentary and appended with a brief summary statement, reflecting the thoughts and conclusions of the social worker assigned to the particular case.
Let us first define mutual oral masturbation in its proper context. The term refers to oral-genital contact and the erotic excitation ensuing from the act. Or, to be more explicit, it means that one partner' places his or her mouth and/or tongue on, around, or in the other person's sex organ. The other person may reciprocate in like manner, as in the case of soixante-neuf, or may choose to be merely a recipient of the act, as in the case of fellatio or cunnilingus. Also, the excitation may be of such a high degree as to produce orgasm, though in some instances the act is intended as a form of "foreplay," in which case orgasm is usually postponed until the final act of coitus.
Due to the contraceptive benefits of mutual oral masturbation and also the erotic pleasures, the mutuality of the practice quite often extends to more that two partners of the opposite sex. That is to say, it may become sociosexually oriented to the extent that a third party is invited to participate, or perhaps two or more other couples. Especially in modern times, with the obsolescence of Victorian mores, this has become increasingly popular in certain liberal-minded circles, such as the little circles of "communes," one of which is described in this book. Certainly it goes without saying that additional mouths and tongues playing over a person's erogenous zones will produce additional erotic pleasure—providing, of course, that jealousies and other emotional conflicts do not interfere with the acts of the multiple participants.
Now what of the derivation of the term "mutual oral masturbation"? And why is it called masturbation? Perhaps one may interpret the word masturbation to mean the manual stimulation of a person's sex organ, either by use of the hand, fingers, or some mechanical device such as an electronic vibrator. But we should note that Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines masturbation as "stimulation of the genital organs to orgasm by manual or other body contact exclusive of sexual intercourse." Clearly, "other body contact" includes oral contact, albeit hand and finger contact may be employed much more frequently. Also, while Webster includes the objective of orgasm in his definition, it is not the objective but the process leading to the objective that constitutes the true act of masturbation. It is the process, in this case oral process, that we are primarily concerned with in this volume.
Some periods of history, of course, have not regarded mutual oral masturbation—or even fellation and cunnilingus, for that matter—with the same academic objectivity as we do today. Not only in the recent Victorian era but well beyond the Renaissance period it was looked upon with virtual horror by the moralists as something utterly perverse. And considering the relative -lack of hygiene, not to mention the much greater prevalence of venereal disease in those times, maybe they had a good point. But our moral perspective, as well as our appreciation of cleanliness, has undergone a drastic change since those periods, to the extent that the underlying reasons for the old strictures and taboos concerning oral love play no longer exist—except in the minds of a few Victorian holdovers.
Actually, in retrospect, the entire space of time from the days of the Caesars to a scant few decades ago was marked within our Western culture by open hostility toward any display or discussion of sex. We note that for well over a thousand years it was considered wholly indecent for a woman to wear clothes that so much as displayed her ankles, and even medical texts sparsely illustrated with sketches of human genitals were forbidden to the general public. And pity the man and woman caught outside the privacy of their boudoir in passionate embrace, especially if they were not married. Such "terrible sinfulness" usually earned them a scathing denunciation, if not severe corporal punishment. But now, thanks to our much more enlightened view of sex, it is possible without the slightest public censure to romp the beaches practically nude and purchase armfuls of the most graphic sex novels at the corner drug store.
Why, then, all of the controversy surrounding the practice of mutual oral masturbation? Frankly speaking, the controversy is not centered on the practice but rather on the legal strictures that are imposed by most of our states against the practice. Which is to say that the laws of the land covering and prohibiting the practice are not keeping pace with the tone of public opinion, much less the extent of public indulgence.
In his Sexual Behavior of the Human Female, Alfred C. Kinsey points out that, where the law is concerned' "charges are likely to be severe if genital manipulations or mouth-genital contacts are involved, for the latter may be penalized as felonies in most of the forty-eight states." In a footnote, his statement is elaborated as follows:
Although historically sodomy was confined to anal intercourse, today in most states some or all parts of mouth-genital contacts are specifically forbidden either as part of the sodomy statutes or in separate statutes. In many other states, some or all mouth-genital contacts are included by judicial decision in the term "crime against nature" or sodomy; or mouth-genital contacts have been considered to be "unnatural" or "perverse" or "lascivious" or "grossly indecent" conduct under statutes forbidding such conduct.
Hence the official codes of law in most states extend punishment to participants in mouth-genital relations under catch-all statutes that inadequately define such acts as "sodomy" and use them to gain felony convictions, irrespective of the fact that no real sodomy is committed and the act is engaged in strictest privacy by consenting adults without any resulting physical or mental injury. Therein lies the crux of the controversy: the flagrant ambiguity of the law arid the threat of severe punishment against all and sundry, even married couples who assume, and rightly so, that in marriage they have become "one flesh" with all of the freedoms and privileges it implies.
Notwithstanding the laws covering mutual oral masturbation, there is abundant evidence to support the contention that such practice is not only widely indulged but is a normal, instinctive, and, in many cases, desirable biological urge. No less an authority that Alfred C. Kinsey has stated in his aforementioned volume:
The significance of the mouth depends, of course, upon the fact that all of its parts are richly supplied with nerves. This is true throughout the class Mammalia, and also true of some of the other vertebrates ... It is not surprising that the two areas of the body which are most sensitive erotically, namely the mouth and genitalia, should frequently be brought into direct contact. The high incidence of such mouth-genital contacts in all species of mammals, from one end to the other of the class Mammalia, and the high frequency of mouth-genital contacts in the human animal have been detailed ...
The question now arises: In what instance would mutual oral masturbation be a desirable biological urge? Actually, from both the medical and nonmedical standpoint, there are many instances. It would be desirable, for example, when married couples are constrained from normal coital intercourse by a physical handicap such as an underdeveloped vaginal channel, or by sex organs that are too insensitive to coitus for the achievement of orgasm in that manner. Again, it would be desirable when one or the other married partner craves the extra stimulation and pleasure to the extent that to withhold it would threaten the solidarity of the union and the security of the offspring.
Modern authorities on sex and family life have no compunctions when it conies to advising mouth-genital sex as part of a well-rounded marital relationship. For example, Maxine Davis advises, in her book Sexual Responsibility of Women:
If the vulva becomes dry during prolonged intercourse and her lubricant is in the medicine chest down the hall, the wife will find that it is far better to moisten the area with the body's other natural lubricant, saliva, than to interrupt their pleasure by getting up and going away from her husband to get the tube or jar she needs.
Of course, she does not come right out and say that the husband should apply the saliva directly to the wife's vagina with his tongue, or that the wife should apply hers directly to the husband's organ, for that would be tantamount to recommending felony in the eye of the law. But the implication is clear. Unquestionably the wise authoress is assuming that the subject wife and husband are not making love with a representative of the law perched on the sidelines watching every move they make.
In this regard, it would be most interesting to learn—if such a survey were possible—the percentage of men and women representing the law who completely abstain from all forms of oral sex, especially those categories that are explicitly forbidden in the statutes. Since the people whose job it is to enforce the law are, in the main, healthy people with normal sex instincts and urges, the odds are that they are no more or less immune to the appeal of oral love than the average citizen. It is no wordier, then, that numerous legislators and judges are standing up now and being counted on the side of those who want the statutes realistically amended.
Realistically, the subject of mutual oral masturbation possesses interest and appeal that goes far beyond the mere pragmatic aspects of the act. Down through the ages many forms of art have glorified human mouth-genital contacts, from ancient Egyptian bas-reliefs to Greek and Roman friezes. Not only can we refer to countless expressions of the practice in the art of the ancient and neoancient Western cultures, but countless more from the old civilizations of the Far East, particularly from the temples of India. Indeed, some of the great classics of art depict men and women engaging in mouth-genital sex, such as Rodin's famous sculpture Soixante-neuf, which leaves nothing to the imagination.
Therefore, if the situations described in the following case histories seem a bit strange, it is only because truth is often the strangest of happenings. Very likely they are but modern enactments of situations that have occurred a thousand times before down through the centuries, with but slight variations.