Introduction
Incest and oralism is not new. Much has been written on each subject, and with each case comes new knowledge on the subject. The scope of incest and oralism is quite broad, and although cases of such continuously come to my attention, I am always excited with the opportunity to further explore this aspect of human sexual behavior.
Incest, as we all know, is the sexual relations between blood relatives; oralism is the use of the mouth.
But, what many people fail to understand is the fact that oralism does not pertain to the licking and sucking of the genitals only. No, oralism pertains to the use of the mouth and it is not restricted to the genitalia, but to other aspects also. We have all heard of a person who is a glutton for food. This, in a narrow sense of the word, can be considered a degree of oralism.
When we apply oralsim to a sexual connotation, we take it to mean the simple use of the mouth in conjunction with the genitals. This simply is not true. A real, dyed-in-the-wool oralist does not confine oral activities to the genitalia alone, but to all parts of the body as well. There are many cases of fetish activity in which the toes of a sexual partner are sucked and licked; of the oral enjoyment to be had by licking one's thighs; of the armpits and various other portions of the body. Those things are considered a fetish when a person derives his sexual pleasure from only one part of a body, and fetishism is not our concern in this study.
What will be our concern is the relationship between incest and oralism. Why is oral sex a preferred method over 'normal' intercourse? Why does the mouth come into play frequently in incestual activities? One can hardly answer such questions unless the personalities of the participants are examined more closely. It is possible that some of the cases of this study are fetishly oriented, but I will not delve into this background at length.
What my primary interest is ... to present the relationship between people who indulge in incestual sex and prefer oralism to any other method. You will find our subjects, although oraly oriented, performing various other sexual postures too, and it is not my purpose to condemn those involved. What is my contention, is that man and woman have the absolute right to enjoy sexual relations in whatever manner they want, without fear of prosecution. I do not necessarily condone the actions of the participants, especially in the sexual use of children, yet I pass no judgment, either.
James Wilburn 1972